<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tim Wu on IP and how it affects industry structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chosaq.net/archives/2006/05/tim-wu-on-ip-and-how-it-affects-industry-structure.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chosaq.net/archives/2006/05/tim-wu-on-ip-and-how-it-affects-industry-structure.html</link>
	<description>A research blog tracking copyright related policy &#038; technology developments in Japan. By Andreas Bovens.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chosaq &#187; Pollock on the value of the public domain</title>
		<link>http://chosaq.net/archives/2006/05/tim-wu-on-ip-and-how-it-affects-industry-structure.html/comment-page-1#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>chosaq &#187; Pollock on the value of the public domain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chosaq.net/archives/2006/05/tim-wu-on-ip-and-how-it-affects-industry-structure.html#comment-399</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothing especially mind-blowing here, but the &#8220;welfare rather than national income&#8221; bit is a great starting point for thinking about public domain related issues. Also interesting is the last sentence, in which Pollock connects public domain issues resp. with the open access movement, Redhat like businesses (offering complementary services to a free product), and the argument Tim Wu makes in his &#8220;Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions&#8221; essay (chosaq entry). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothing especially mind-blowing here, but the &#8220;welfare rather than national income&#8221; bit is a great starting point for thinking about public domain related issues. Also interesting is the last sentence, in which Pollock connects public domain issues resp. with the open access movement, Redhat like businesses (offering complementary services to a free product), and the argument Tim Wu makes in his &#8220;Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions&#8221; essay (chosaq entry). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

