<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the importance of mobile content portability overstated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chosaq.net/archives/2007/01/is-the-importance-of-mobile-content-portability-overstated.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chosaq.net/archives/2007/01/is-the-importance-of-mobile-content-portability-overstated.html</link>
	<description>A research blog tracking copyright related policy &#038; technology developments in Japan. By Andreas Bovens.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kutty</title>
		<link>http://chosaq.net/archives/2007/01/is-the-importance-of-mobile-content-portability-overstated.html#comment-10055</link>
		<dc:creator>kutty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chosaq.net/archives/2007/01/is-the-importance-of-mobile-content-portability-overrated.html#comment-10055</guid>
		<description>mobile phones should be allowed in skewl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mobile phones should be allowed in skewl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian beaty</title>
		<link>http://chosaq.net/archives/2007/01/is-the-importance-of-mobile-content-portability-overstated.html#comment-7959</link>
		<dc:creator>ian beaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chosaq.net/archives/2007/01/is-the-importance-of-mobile-content-portability-overrated.html#comment-7959</guid>
		<description>As a music producer, a proponent of portability in general, and a community manager for a site (ProjectOpus.com) which would very much like to users (bands and musics fans) to be able to move content in and out of our network with ease, I found this concept that "the kids don't mind" very interesting.  I can almost understand the desire to "start fresh" with a new network, IF the social experience of actually building the network and contacts etc is what you are there for.  For many a band, really ought to be active on DOZENS of hundreds of mp3 hosting/music social network sites, portability would improve the experience for EVERYONE, most of all browsers and fans who would MUCH less often wind up viewing a site with "no bio" "no blog entries" 1 picture and a few songs...   This is a consistent problem across the board in music, I've found. Bring on portability for the rest of us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a music producer, a proponent of portability in general, and a community manager for a site (ProjectOpus.com) which would very much like to users (bands and musics fans) to be able to move content in and out of our network with ease, I found this concept that &#8220;the kids don&#8217;t mind&#8221; very interesting.  I can almost understand the desire to &#8220;start fresh&#8221; with a new network, IF the social experience of actually building the network and contacts etc is what you are there for.  For many a band, really ought to be active on DOZENS of hundreds of mp3 hosting/music social network sites, portability would improve the experience for EVERYONE, most of all browsers and fans who would MUCH less often wind up viewing a site with &#8220;no bio&#8221; &#8220;no blog entries&#8221; 1 picture and a few songs&#8230;   This is a consistent problem across the board in music, I&#8217;ve found. Bring on portability for the rest of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
